注册

发新话题 回复该主题

关于祭祀加血技能的看法 [复制链接]

1#
这游戏总体来说还是不错的,但就人族和兽族职业的技能问题发表下个人看发:现目前的职业技能到后期来看,人族的技能总体上来说弱于兽族,先说剑士,除了血厚攻击技能基本是杀不死人,攻击不高,除了挨打没别的突出的地方,移动速度跑不过猎人和祭祀;相对兽族战士来说,攻击比不上战士,碰到祭祀更是只有跑的份,剑士的晕人技能更是鸡肋,晕2秒能晕住什么?碰到猎人和祭祀晕完后就只剩挨打了。再说祭祀,加血速度超快,几秒时间血就能回满,人族加魔防有什么用?挡不住祭祀连续放毒跟吸血,百游内部的人自己要好好玩下这个游戏就自己会发现,兽族玩的职业祭司和猎人是最多的,人族除了游侠技能稍微好点,剩下2个职业还有几个人在玩?总的来看现在的几个大区人组合兽族实力是不均衡的,兽族普遍比人族强,为什么这样,根本原因就是职业技能的不均衡造成的,兽族技能比人族强大,玩兽族的人越来越多,祭祀和猎人越来越多,人族除了游侠,剩下2个职业玩的人越来越少,这样下去人族越来越没人玩了,估计以后人族会没人玩了,试问人族的RMB玩家花钱就只是让更多的兽族来虐自己忙,说句实话,不是玩人族的不团结,只是兽族的技能比人族要好很多,大家玩人族看不到前途,所以现在没几个愿意投入更多的rmb去搞装备,个人认为兽族的祭祀加血技能应该要限制下,加血技能不能向现在这样加的这么快这么多,战士和剑士的优势在这游戏里一点都体现不出来,如果还是这样下去建议兽血可以取消近战的职业了,人族全部玩游侠,兽族全部玩猎人和祭祀。
以上的看法代表个人浅见,欢迎广大玩家批评指正。
本主题由 百游客服 GM224 于 2011/6/16 3:26:16 执行 移动主题 操作
分享 转发
TOP
2#

多玩 多看 别还没体会游戏精髓 就在乱说。 这游戏讲的就是团队。
TOP
3#

觉得祭祀加血很快?要改?你咋不说技能攻击速度慢?还有攻击比别人滴?
TOP
4#

找个几秒钟回满血的祭祀给我看看.......................别说是从1W血回到2W血.................
TOP
5#

Sea-Front or Action-gate
June 25, 2005Seagate Technologies' web site now indicates the company offers data recovery services. Further investigation shows the shipping address,Christian Louboutin pas cher, the place to send your subject drive for data recovery service,Christian Louboutin, actually belongs to ActionFront Data Recovery. Many may already be aware of this little tidbit, to others it may be a surprise.When asked about their arrangement Seagate's Mike Hall responded, "The services are in trials with a limited number of customers at this time so, as with any other Seagate beta program, there's little we can share about them other than what appears on our web site." ActionFront's Ron Austin responded with a simple, "No comment". So much for gathering facts.Hard disk drives wear-out by nature, a percentage fail prematurely, their storage content can be corrupted and often consumers neglect or are unaware of their responsibility to backup the data. Messages posted in forums and other comments I've received suggest that those who experience drive failures, place the blame for failure on the drive manufacturer. Subsequent occurrences almost always result in a "black-ball the brand" attitude by consumers. These people are not happy at the prospect of spending hundreds or thousands of dollars to recover data. It's doubtful that a hard drive manufacturer offering such services will be well received.Until this recent **nge hard drive manufacturers have not offered the service, presumably for liability reasons. Hence,polo ralph lauren pas cher, the birth of the data recovery service industry. ActionFront is an industry leader that has, over the years, expanded at a fast pace. They are technically capable and have surpassed many competitors. They are also, quite obviously, veracious sales and marketing experts. I've always held the belief that if drive manufacturers offered data recovery services it would kill the independent shops. Kudos to ActionFront for such a prestigious achievement, with one caveat. It's always dangerous for a mouse to sleep with a lion.Any hard disk drive manufacturer would be more qualified to perform data recovery services than an independent firm. They certainly have the knowledge, equipment and technology necessary. Why would Seagate need, or want, to align themselves with any data recovery service company? Is this arrangement profitable for Seagate? Does Seagate get access to competitive technology with this arrangement? Could this be a prelude to a Seagate buyout of ActionFront? If there is no intent to pur**se ActionFront, will this adversely affect Seagate in the long-run? Does ActionFront just have an excellent inside connection with Seagate? If ActionFront does have an excellent inside connection with Seagate, what technologies or information has Seagate provided to ActionFront that other data recovery shops don't have access to? No comments and limited responses do allot to raise questions not to mention suspicion.Some may feel that this union brings a certain amount of legitimacy to the data recovery service industry. That may be true from one point-of-view. From another point-of-view Seagate stands to lose goodwill if consumers perceive the company as taking advantage of them. There is no foreseeable benefit to the consumer,ralph lauren pas cher, as there is no apparent motivation for ActionFront to reduce prices or improve service as a result of the alliance. For now there is only one clear winner,louboutin pas cher, and that's ActionFront.Ri**rd K. Myers
Owner/Webmaster http://www.data-recovery-hub.com
相关的主题文章:

  
   贵金属价格在明年能否延续涨势很大程度上也取决于利率的变化
  
   机构观点转向多方
  
   可能名称不好听
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题